Houses
and Units
A Mum and Dad developer in the suburbs created a dual
occupancy. The builder’s work was defective in the extreme.
The case went to the Department of Fair Trading with a number
of
experts. The case was successfully resolved to the satisfaction
of our clients.
In another matter, a substantial builder with 30 years experience
has had claims made against it in respect of defects by an
insurer and unit holders of a strata plan. The defects are
over 10 years old. In this case the catalog of defects was
poorly documented by the other side’s solicitors. We
were able to respond to the evidence, saving our client from
corrective work that could not have been its to rectify. Importantly
we used a team of experts and barristers who specialise in
construction work and, in particular, defects.
International Arbitration in Hong Kong for Defective
Work
to the Tsing Ma Bridge.
The defect rectification of certain substantial parts of
the works on the Tsing Ma Bridge in Hong Kong resulted in
an international arbitration spanning 4 countries and involved
a substantial claim. Extraordinarily large pieces of the
Tsing Ma Bridge
were manufactured on an assembly line in China
and floated downriver and lifted into place in Hong Kong.
Brett Vincent defended the Hong Kong sub-contracting company
over a period of three years, which resulted in the London
arbitration being settled before any substantial hearing.
30 Storey Building Demolition because of Fraud
The collapse and subsidence of a recently constructed thirty
storey building in Hong Kong resulted in litigation and prison
sentences for certain key engineers on site. The engineer
had fraudulently certified that the piles had hit bedrock
at 60 metres, when in fact the piles had only been dug to
less than fifteen metres. The engineer’s mistake was
that he put all the short piles in one corner. Had the engineer
spread the piles out around the building, the fraud would
never have been detected. The fraud caused a serious loss
of confidence in public housing in Hong Kong. Litigation
against the building company was commenced in order to recover
the demolition costs of the building and other losses. For
political reasons of public confidence the matter went to
a hearing.
Brett Vincent, along with other Hong Kong legal personnel,
prepared evidence to successfully recover damages from the
contractor.
Geotechnical Defects
A geotechnical engineering company provided advice that resulted
in the collapse of the flexible pavement at a port waterfront
on reclaimed land. The designed flexible pavement was recommended
for earthworks on which heavy containers and moving equipment
would be loaded and transported. The pavement ultimately
failed. The geotechnical conditions of the soil proved to
be inadequate to carry the loads upon which the containers
traveled. The tensely fought case against the geotechnical
engineer settled after the plaintiff’s evidence of
damages were successfully cross-examined by counsel for our
client.
Corroding Roof Sheets
In far North Queensland a recycling digester of natural vegetation
decomposed matter so well that the caustic fumes coming from
the material ate all that it encountered. The painted steel
of the heavy earthmoving equipment used to move the vegetation
corroded if left in the shed overnight. The roof of the building
ultimately corroded away. The subcontractor was pursued by
the contractor for this issue as well as non compliance with
insurance under the contract. After a detailed review of
the contract documents. Legal advice proposed to reject liability
and resist the contractor’s claims. The matter settled
without litigation after several months of heated negotiations.
top |